← Home
Seides evaluates the endowment model (heavy allocation to alternatives: PE, hedge funds, venture, real estate) 20 years after David Swensen popularized it. The verdict: it works for Yale-caliber allocators but has been disastrous for smaller endowments that lack the access and expertise.
Canon
•
Seides argues that Swensen's book taught the strategy (allocate to alternatives) but couldn't teach the judgment (which alternatives, which managers, when to be patient). The biography-as-mentor gave the framework; execution requires the wisdom that only experience provides.
Highlights
•
The endowment model works for Yale ($41B, top-tier manager access) but has failed most imitators — smaller endowments lack the access, expertise, and patience to execute it
Seides presents the data: Yale's endowment returned 13.1% annually over 20 years. The average university endowment returned 7.8%. The gap isn't strategy — it's execution. Yale has access to the best managers, the best staff, and a board willing to be patient. Most endowments have none of these.